Social Science Review

Keywords		Abstract
Caste-based Samaj, Inter-caste love marriage, Hindu marriage traditions, Gendered impact, Social exclusion		This study aims to investigate the impact of the social structure within caste-based communities. A significant part of the structure is samaj. The way Samaj treats inter-caste couples and the societal challenges faced by the couples are the primary concerns of this research. Gender discrimination and gender-based norms have been investigated carefully. It also observes the urban setting, education, and economic solvency in reducing caste discrimination. Qualitative approaches have been employed in conducting this specific research. There are four case studies and one FGD to conduct the study, following David R. Thomas’s inductive approach. The study's outcome informs us about the ongoing influence and persistence of caste norms and traditional values within this specific Hindu samaj, particularly in rural areas. Moreover, it extends the social exclusion in rural communities and the stigmatization of inter-caste couples. Often, women in such inter-caste marriages are the greatest sufferers in terms of physical, psychological, and emotional aspects. However, urban exposure, education, and financial independence accelerate, reducing the impact of caste norms. Although Urbanization and its related ecosystem help reduce caste-based prejudice, broad social reforms are essential for its complete eradication.

Introduction

Marriage in Hindu society is not just a tie of two individuals; it is a sacred contract shaped by caste, tradition, and the powerful influence of Samaj. Caste, marriage, and samaj are correlated to each other in various ways among the Hindus of the Indian subcontinent. Samaj is a caste-based collective body that oversees the regulatory matters of a specific caste or community. For instance, Shudra Samaj is a selective body of the Shudra Caste. The Samaj considers marriage as a social, religious, spiritual, and legal union of individuals. (Dhar, 2013). Marriage holds significant meaning in a society that is caste-based. In the Bangladeshi Hindu Samaj, inter-caste marriage is considered to be prohibited and sinful by almost all the castes. It is essential to understand how the inter-caste couple formed a marriage union. How does Samaj react towards inter-caste couples within its framework? 

 

The Hindu community in Bangladesh forms about 7.95% of the population (BBS, 2023). Bangladesh ranks as the third-largest Hindu-populated country after India and Nepal, with significant concentrations in the Khulna Division (11.52%). It has historically maintained a distinct identity within the broader society. Traditionally rooted in the zamindari system under British rule, the Hindu Samaj continued to function through various political transitions from British India to East Pakistan (1947) and later, independent Bangladesh (1971). Despite Islam being the state religion, the constitution ensures equal rights for all religious groups. The Hindus of Bangladesh are traditionally divided into upper, lower, and scheduled caste groups. Besides the Brahmin, Kshatriya, and Vaishya, there are the lower castes, known as Shudra, which include traditional serfs, artisans, agricultural laborers, and outcastes (Atishudras). At the bottom of the society, these are the stigmatized, ritually polluted, and despised "untouchables", upon whom Mahatma Gandhi bestowed the euphemistic name "Harijan" (children of God Vishnu). Jaiswal (1998) Claims, “In its conception, varna stratification is both functional and hierarchical.” 

 

The Hindu marriage system is deeply intertwined with caste hierarchies, with the Samaj serving as a regulatory body to preserve traditional norms and lineage. (Dhar, 2013; Jaiswal, 1998). In rural areas, the Shudra Samaj vigorously enforces endogamous marriages, and any violation, primarily through inter-caste love marriages, is seen as a disruption of the social fabric and a challenge to ancestral order. (Kansakar & Ghimire, 2008). Although educational opportunities and increasing social mobility have contributed to the rise of inter-caste relationships among younger generations (Kalmijn, 1991)These marriages are often met with resistance, social ostracism, and community sanctions. (Silver, 1994). Despite the growing prevalence of such unions, there is a lack of focused research on how inter-caste couples negotiate social pressures and how the Samaj responds to these transgressions in the specific context of rural Hindu communities in southern Bangladesh. Previous studies have addressed various aspects of caste and marriage. The origin and continuation of caste hierarchies, which were institutionalized during the British colonial era (Jaiswal, 1998; Vaidyanathan, 2023), have been well-documented. Scholars have also examined the role of caste-based community bodies, such as the Samaj, in maintaining marriage rules and enforcing social control. (Dhar, 2013; Kansakar & Ghimire, 2008). Research by Kalmijn (1991) Highlights how individual preferences, social group norms, and the limitations of the marriage market influence marriage decisions. Studies from both India and Nepal have further explored the societal rejection and partial acceptance faced by inter-caste couples. (Dhar, 2013; Kansakar & Ghimire, 2008). However, these findings are not adequately contextualized within Bangladeshi rural Hindu society. The study is significant because existing literature, although rich in the broader South Asian context, does not capture the specific tensions and conflicts faced by inter-caste couples in rural Bangladesh. The study is increasingly significant as more young people, empowered by education and urban exposure, defy caste restrictions, which can lead to personal crises. Family disputes and community conflicts (Dhar, 2013). These marriages challenge the core of hereditary social order and create moral anxiety within the Samaj. (Kalmijn, 1991). Despite these changing dynamics, there has been limited research on how inter-caste couples navigate the challenges imposed by the Samaj and how the community responds to these marriages. This study aims to explore the influence of caste-based Samaj on inter-caste love marriages among Hindus in Southern Bangladesh and examine the societal challenges inter-caste couples face. Additionally, it seeks to understand the gendered impact of caste-based Social Structures, particularly the disproportionate suffering experienced by women, and the role of urban exposure, education, and financial independence in mitigating their influence. Understanding these dynamics is essential not only to grasp the shifting nature of rural Hindu social structures but also to inform future academic research and social policy interventions that address the realities of social change in southern Bangladesh.

 

Materials and Methods:

This research focuses on the responses of Shudra Samaj and inter-caste weddings in Kharariya Pargana, a non-official geographical entity within Bagerhat District, southern Bangladesh. Using a qualitative method, a case study was employed to survey the Bagerhat district, Bangladesh (see the Figure). Shudra Samaj connections and personal networks helped to identify respondents; further social media outreach was used as needed. To gather group opinions on inter-caste weddings, a focus group was also conducted with key members of the Shudra Samaj. Moreover, an inductive approach was used during the study, following David R. Thomas, (2006)The gathered data were transcribed and examined iteratively, reading, coding of raw data, and category development (see the Figure 1). 

Figure 1: Inductive approach of David Thomas.

Source: Thomas (2006).

 

Additional contextual background information was obtained from various secondary sources, including government documents, research articles, media reports, and NGO publications. Data collection took place from December 2019 to January 2020. Finally, the data were analyzed thematically to generate and address the study's objectives, aligning with existing studies (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Guest et al., 2011; King et al., 2018). In case studies like this one, thematic analysis helps uncover underlying societal pressures, individual experiences, and the broader institutional influences, such as the role of Samaj in caste-based marriage regulations.

Figure 2: Location of the study. 

Source: Digital Map Download (2025).

 

Demographic profile of the respondents:

There were five categories of respondents across various categories. It represents a different demographic category, such as age, gender, marital status, education level, occupation, family size, ethnicity, residence type, income level, and religious affiliation. According to the profile, the individual respondents show their corresponding details for each demographic category. Refer to Table 1, which helps organize and display the data clearly, making it easy to analyze the various demographic features of the respondents within the context of the study.

 

Table 1 Demographic profile of the respondents & Insights

 

The Historical Background of the Hindu Samaj of Kharariya Pargana:

Initially, the Kharariya Pargana consisted of a single Shudra Samaj that encompassed all its villages. As the population grew, the pargana was divided into North and South Kharariya, each comprising 21 villages, which were further grouped into three Saptapallis. According to Monimohon Chowdhury, an active member of the Samaj, “Hindu Samaj is an internal administrative committee of a few members. Every Hindu family must be social towards every member of this committee… It is an essential duty to show particular respect… at various social events and occasions.” He noted that once the Samaj expanded, it became impractical to involve every member in each gathering, which prompted the creation of multiple smaller Samaj units. Initially, these samaj structures relied on unwritten, verbal rules. However, Santosh Mondal pointed out that “Hindu society was formed and governed according to the Vedic Shastras… If anyone were acting against the Samaj, he would have to become an active member again through the satisfaction of the Narayan deity.” While these customs were once purely oral, the present-day Hindu Samaj is fully documented: leadership identities and decisions are recorded in a registrar book. This transition from verbal tradition to written governance reflects both the cultural roots of the community and its evolving administrative requirements.

 

Governance Structure of the Samaj: 

The Structural form of Kharariya Milla:

Kharariya Pargana, historically part of the Khulna division in Bangladesh, once comprised 42 villages. While no modern maps refer to Kharariya by name, local Hindu communities preserve its cultural practices. To manage this large territory, the pargana was split into North Kharariya Milla and South Kharariya Milla, each with 21 villages. According to Manmohan Chowdhury, “It is challenging to manage society in this vast area. So, they decide on their own and divide this vast region into two.” See Figure 2

Figure 3: The structural form of Kharariya Milla.

Source: Social Registrar of Southern Saptapalli, North Kharaiya Milla, under Kharariya Pargana, 2007. Monimohon Chowdhury, an active member of Southern Saptapalli Samaj, maintains it.

Each Milla is further divided into three Saptapalli—Southern, Middle, and Northern—each comprising seven villages. In every Saptapalli, a designated member oversees religious and social events, from marriages to death anniversaries. My research focuses on the Southern Saptapalli of the Northern Kharariya Milla, which includes Dwiganga, Baraigaty, Sarulia, Shurigaty, Chandarhat, Agrakandua, and Kakari. 

 

The membership structure of Southern Saptapalli:

In Southern Saptapalli, the Samajpati serves as the head of the Hindu society, overseeing the entire Milla. According to Manmohan Chowdhury, who helps maintain the Social Registrar, “It is challenging to manage society in this vast area. So, they decide on their own and divide this vast region into two.” Consequently, each Milla appoints three Samajpati. Directly below them are the Shironama, who may be delegated certain powers—particularly the permission to conduct marriage and other rituals—while the Zirnama convey decisions to the broader community.

Initially, membership in these roles was based on an achieved status, reflecting an individual’s capacity to organize religious functions. Over time, it evolved into an ascribed status, whereby positions could be inherited. One method of becoming a recognized leader is through Narayan worship and rice-curry giving: “The person who wants to be the head of the society will invite all the Hindu families of the area. When Narayan Puja is completed, he will donate clothes to all active members of the community…and make arrangements for the invited families to eat.” Afterward, a Brahmin priest and Samaj members sign the registrar, cementing the new leader’s legitimacy. Based on the gathered information, the hierarchical structure of the Shudra Samaj is followed in Figure 1

Figure 1 The broad structure of the Shudra Samaj

Source: Social Registrar of Southern Saptapalli, North Kharaiya Milla, under Kharariya Pargana, 2007. Monimohon Chowdhury, an active member of Southern Saptapalli Samaj, maintains it.

 

The Samaj also manages social and welfare functions. Manoranjan Bala highlights this role: “If a father is not capable of marrying a daughter, he can seek help from the Samaj. The Samaj always strives to take responsibility for her marriage.” An Executive Committee—often comprising individuals who already hold roles like Shironama—oversees finances, ensuring transparency and continued communal support. See the Figure 2.

 

Monimohon Chowdhury, an active member of Southern Saptapalli Samaj, maintains it. Although it is a voluntary body, it holds high prestige among the ordinary people of the Samaj. They are not a legally recognized body by the government. It is a micro-body within the Shudra Samaj responsible for maintaining the financial activities of the Samaj.  

 

Figure 2 The hierarchical structure of the Executive Committee of the Shudra Samaj

Source: Social Registrar of Southern Saptapalli, North Kharaiya Milla, under Kharariya Pargana, 2007. 

It often happens that the same person plays a dual role in the Samaj. For instance, the cashier and the Shironama are the same person, as they belong to the Shudra Samaj.

 

Result: 

The Prescribed Kinship Structure of Kharariya Milla regarding marriage:

Within Kharariya Milla’s Shudra Samaj, marriage rules are shaped by strict adherence to Vedic scriptures and a focus on preserving kinship boundaries. Monmotho Kumar Banik explains, “Marriage is the social bond that Samaj gives the most focus on. Because Samaj emphasizes the importance of reproducing relationships for its survival.” According to him, any deviation from prescribed kinship relations could undermine the very foundation of the Samaj. Santosh Kumar Mondal adds that “Hindu Samaj runs according to Vedic rituals and scriptures… If a couple has a son, then the son cannot marry any daughter of his mother or father’s descent.” He cites the Atharva Veda’s caution against marrying within one’s paternal or maternal lines, noting fears of health risks and potential social collapse. Gopal Chandra Bala stresses caste purity, asserting that “Intermarriage spoils the purity of blood relations.” Mondal also recounts the story of Namos Muni, a Brahmin whose sons were expelled from an ashram and sheltered by a Shudra family, allegedly founding a new caste. He uses this narrative to illustrate why “intermarriage is prohibited according to Vedic scriptures,” reinforcing the Samaj’s emphasis on caste and kinship boundaries.

 

The Punishments for Violating the Traditional Norms of the Marriage of Kharariya Milla:

Within the Shudra Samaj of Kharariya Milla, marriage rules are enforced with stringent restrictions aimed at preserving caste purity. Interviewees repeatedly emphasize the severity of punishments for those who transgress these norms. According to Manoranjan Haldar, “Samaj holds them in solitude as a punishment; that is, a person who does not follow the instructions of the Samaj will not be able to join the Samaj.” Exclusion from communal life stands as one of the core sanctions, effectively isolating offenders from social and religious activities. When asked about marriages that violate kinship prescriptions—such as marrying within a father’s maternal lineage—Santosh Kumar Mondal clarifies, “Their children will be segregated from their Samaj… No other member of the community shall invite the family to any social event. They will not make any financial transactions with them. They will be boycotted socially as well as religiously.” This ban applies equally to inter-caste marriages with lower castes or Dalit communities. Conversely, Mondal notes that “Though they emphasize same-caste marriage, the marriage with an upper caste is not considered problematic,” reflecting the Samaj’s view on purity and pollution. To regain membership after a lesser offense, the Shudra Samaj typically requires worship of Narayana, along with material reparations. Monimohan Chowdhury explains, “Narayana worship is usually given to anyone who breaks any tradition. The accused has to arrange a banquet for the village elders… and pay unique gifts or gift items such as new clothes and money.” However, for graver violations such as severe inter-caste marriages, the Samaj imposes “complicated provisions,” including a ritual known locally as “limb atonement.”

Mondal further describes this practice: “After practicing all kinds of religious rituals, the accused has to shave off the hair of his head, and the rest of the Samaj members pour rotten milk over his head. It is an abusive process whereby a person is shamed… society wants others not to do the same for fear of punishment.” This public humiliation underscores the Samaj’s determination to deter any breach of traditional marriage norms. By strictly enforcing these rules, the Shudra Samaj believes it maintains the purity of its lineage and upholds the hierarchical framework of Hindu society. Through social ostracism, ritual penalties, and financial reparations, community leaders ensure adherence to cultural traditions, preserving caste boundaries for future generations.

 

The Naturalization Process of Kharariya Milla: 

The Shudra Samaj of Kharariya Milla closely oversees marriage practices, including inter-caste unions. According to Monimohan Chowdhury, “If a couple marries from inter-caste, then they have to go through Samaj for social acceptance.” This process begins with Narayana puja and other social rituals, after which the Samaj convenes a meeting to discuss the circumstances of the couple’s marriage. As Monimohan explains, “All activities were initiated by giving due respect to samajpati in the meeting.” During these discussions, the couple must pledge adherence to Samaj rules and offer financial contributions. “To donate a huge amount of money to honor the Shudra Samaj is a must,” emphasizes Chowdhury. Penalties for inter-caste marriages vary based on the couple’s status. Gopal Krishna Bala and Santosh Mandal note that “if the accused couple is educated, then the Samaj imposes short penalties. Because the purohit suggests that the holy text suggests short penalties for educated people.” However, harsher punishments apply to “general people,” who lack significant education or influence, thereby reinforcing cultural barriers to inter-caste unions.

 

The Political Autonomy of the Hindu Samaj:

In terms of political influence, several interviewees highlight the Samaj’s autonomy. As one respondent remarks, “There is a Union Parishad in the lower level of government. The chairpersons and other members of the Parishad tend to exercise authority over the rural Hindu Samaj. However, all such members of the Samaj were denied such intervention.” This reflects the deeply rooted nature of the Shudra Samaj, which operates independently of formal government structures. Bangladesh’s marriage laws, while officially recognized, seldom interfere with the religious and caste-based customs that guide the Shudra Samaj’s decisions. Through these mechanisms, the community maintains its lineage, identity, and cultural practices without significant outside intervention.

 

 

 

 

The Union of Inter-caste Love Marriage and Experiences within Societal Context:

In Kharariya Milla, the Shudra Samaj exercises significant authority over social and religious practices, especially regarding marriage. Inter-caste unions, though legally permissible, remain socially fraught. Couples who marry across caste lines risk expulsion, humiliation rituals, and loss of familial support. Despite these obstacles, some individuals pursue inter-caste love marriages, driven by personal attachments that transcend rigid social norms.

 

Case Study 1: Bipul Biswas and His Lower-Caste Wife:

Background and Motivation

Bipul Biswas, an uneducated young man from the Shudra Samaj, fell in love with a woman considered “untouchable” by local standards. According to him, “I first met her while visiting a relative’s house. The two of us exchanged ideas. I liked her very much. However, there was no question of her caste in mind.” Despite warnings from friends and disapproval from his family, Bipul proceeded with the marriage: “I told my parents about it. They refuse to cooperate with me in this regard… My nearest neighbors and relatives refuse to cooperate with me on any such marriage. I am bound to marry her at her house without my relatives, family, on my own.”

 

Social Repercussions

Upon returning with his new wife, they encountered immediate pressure from the Shudra Samaj. Traditional rites mandate that a new bride be ritually accepted into the community; however, the Samaj demanded a humiliating ritual: “The Samaj suggests that my wife and I have to shave our heads in front of the people of the community. They will pour rotten milk on our heads. I have to give them clothes and financial gifts… 500 takas for Samajpati and 100 for other members of the Samaj.” Bipul vehemently refused these punishments: “Because my wife is of the lower castes, I reject this humiliating punishment and the provisions of Samaj… As a result, they alienated my family from society.”

 

Economic and Family Impact

Bipul operates a tea stall, which some community members boycotted to avoid potential repercussions from Samaj leaders: “Some people do not come to my tea shop. They think that one of the rulers of the Hindu Samaj may punish them for this.” However, Bipul’s main worry is the future marriage prospects of his children: “I have a son and a daughter. I have to be at the door of Samaj. Otherwise, no other family would want to be in a bond of kinship with our family.” Here, the fear of social ostracism persists long after the marriage itself has taken place. Bipul’s case illustrates the stringent barriers lower-caste individuals face when marrying into Shudra society—barriers that demand ritual humiliation and the threat of collective boycott.

 

Case Study 2: Nupur (Sudra Woman) and Her Brahmin Husband:

Love Across Castes in an Urban Setting

Nupur, an educated Sudra woman, left her village for higher studies and lived in a town hostel. There, she met a Brahmin classmate, and a romantic relationship developed between them. Unlike Bipul’s case, both partners were aware of their caste difference from the start: “From the beginning of our relationship, we both knew that we were different castes. However, we were highly educated, so we did not take this issue seriously.”

 

 

 

Family and Samaj Resistance

Nupur’s parents disapproved, while her partner’s Brahmin family also rejected the prospect of a caste “downgrade” marriage. Nupur recalls: “My family also threatens me that if I am bound to marry that son, all ties with me will be severed… The two of us went to a temple and tied the marriage before the purohit of the temple.” Friends in the city offered vital emotional and logistical support, which helped them overcome immediate obstacles. However, her parents cut off contact after the wedding: “My mother would occasionally contact me on mobile and inquire about our condition… but as a family, our relationship is not yet formed.”

 

Integration into the Husband’s Family

Despite their initial resistance, Nupur’s in-laws eventually accepted her on the condition that she observe Brahmin norms and reduce contact with her natal family. Over time, she complied with these rules: “I had to go through a series of social norms. By fully observing them, I am now somewhat acceptable within my husband’s house.” Nupur’s experience reveals how education can slightly ease, though not eliminate, caste-based barriers. The acceptance she gained hinged on meeting Brahmin standards of ritual practice, underscoring how patriarchal and caste hierarchies intersect in shaping a woman’s marital life.

 

Case Study 3: Anup Roy (Sudra Man) and His Brahmin Bride:

Overseas Employment and Courtship

Anup Roy spent five years working in Singapore. During that time, he maintained a relationship with a Brahmin girl from his village. Encouraged by his own family, who saw a social advantage in marrying “up,” Anup tried to formalize the union by seeking the bride’s parents’ blessing: “My father went to that Brahmin family with a marriage proposal. Then my father was insulted and abused. They continue to emphasize that this relationship cannot be in any way.”

 

Eliciting a Quick Marriage

Determined to marry, Anup asked his fiancée to move in with him, bypassing her parents’ consent: “Before the wedding, the girl came to our house, my family and relatives completed our marriage.” This breach of the Shudra Samaj procedure carried its penalty. Although his family initially welcomed an upper-caste daughter-in-law, they had not secured the Samaj’s formal approval. As a result, they were required to appease the community: “Since I got married without the Sudra Samaj’s permission… they asked me to organize a banquet instead of a hard sentence… We had to give every member of the Samaj a gift of 100 taka and a new dhoti cloth.”

 

Rationale for Compliance

Anup defends these measures as necessary to avoid social isolation: “He says that society is an organization of united people. We live in a community… If they do not follow them, then Samaj excludes us. Just as I could not renounce my love, I did not want to endanger my family for violating the rules of society.” Anup’s situation underscores the distinct leniency the Shudra Samaj shows when a marriage involves “marrying up” into a Brahmin lineage. The penalty is significantly reduced compared to cases in which a Shudra marries a person from a lower or “untouchable” community.

 

 

 

 

Case Study 4: Beauty Mistry (Rishi/Dalit Woman) and Her Shudra Husband:

Socioeconomic Background

Beauty Mistry grew up in a Dalit (Rishi) community, which the Shudra and other higher-caste groups typically view as “untouchable.” Despite poverty, she pursued her education diligently, eventually securing a banking job in Dhaka. There, she met a man from the Shudra Samaj who treated her with kindness and respect: “He was quite progressive and generous. He treated me well. Slowly, I started to like him.”

 

Marriage and Aftermath

When the couple decided to wed, the man’s parents vehemently opposed the union: “He tried to talk to his family… but his parents disapproved. We both got married at the court. Since there is no legal restriction on our marriage, the court allowed our union to proceed. “In reaction, his family disowned him: “They deprived him of all property. Although we live happily ever after, I am very sorry about that. For me, he had to leave his family.”

 

Reinforcing Caste Lines

Unlike Anup Roy’s case, this “marrying down” union triggered greater hostility from both family and Samaj. Beauty’s story exemplifies how caste purity remains central to Shudra identity; transgressing this boundary by marrying a Dalit woman provokes severe repercussions, such as disinheritance and permanent estrangement.

 

Comparative Analysis of the Case Studies

According to the finding, the four cases collectively illustrate the intricate social ecosystem of Kharariya Milla, where the Shudra Samaj presides over marriage norms in following the Table . Additionally, these narratives confirm that external support networks (such as friends, secular authorities, and other religious communities) can help mitigate social and economic repercussions. In some instances, the presence of local officials from a different faith (e.g., a Muslim chairperson) or a diverse clientele can provide financial stability, despite Samaj's disapproval.

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of the Case Studies.

1. Caste Hierarchy and Punishment	Marrying Down (e.g., a Shudra marrying a Dalit) often incurs humiliation rituals, potential ostracism, and financial penalties. Marrying Up (e.g., a Shudra marrying into a Brahmin family) usually invites a more lenient response, such as organizing a banquet or offering nominal gifts to the Samaj.
2. The Centrality of Women’s Bodies in Caste Purity	In each scenario, the fate of the marriage (and its acceptance) hinges largely on how a woman’s caste status is perceived. In patrilineal systems, a bride’s “lower” caste status threatens the purity of her husband’s lineage, prompting severe sanctions. Conversely, if her caste is “higher,” the groom’s family may see strategic benefits or a limited penalty.
3. Fear, Compliance, and Social Sanctions	Couples face psychological dread of boycott, while families fear the erosion of social ties. Even those who reject Samaj regulations (like Bipul Biswas) worry about their children’s future marriages—an area where community acceptance is often decisive

Source: Compiled by authors, 2025

Discussion

The study titled Samaj and Inter-caste Love Marriage Among Hindus in Southern Bangladesh aimed to explore the influence of caste-based Samaj (social community) on inter-caste love marriages among Hindus in Southern Bangladesh. The research also examined the societal challenges faced by inter-caste couples, particularly focusing on the gendered impact of caste-based Samaj, and how traditional social norms exacerbate the disproportionate suffering experienced by women. The study further investigated the role of urban exposure, education, and financial independence in reducing the influence of caste-based discrimination on inter-caste marriages.

The study's findings highlighted several important aspects regarding inter-caste love marriages and caste-based Social Structures. Firstly, the research revealed that caste-based Samaj continues to play a significant role in shaping the perceptions and experiences of inter-caste couples, with many facing social exclusion, family opposition, and community stigmatization. This societal influence was found to be more pronounced in rural areas, where traditional values hold greater sway. In contrast, urban exposure, particularly through higher education and employment, was identified as a mitigating factor, as it tends to reduce the pressure of caste norms and enables individuals to form relationships based on personal preference rather than caste affiliation. Gendered analysis within the study revealed that women in inter-caste marriages tend to suffer disproportionately, facing more severe emotional and physical violence, family rejection, and social isolation than their male counterparts. This disparity can be attributed to entrenched patriarchal structures in the caste system, which place a higher premium on the protection of women’s purity and family honor. The role of education and financial independence, especially among women, has emerged as a key factor in reducing the influence of caste-based norms, providing individuals, particularly women, with the tools to resist societal pressures and assert greater autonomy in their relationships.

However, there are conflicting perspectives in the literature regarding the extent to which urban exposure and education can truly challenge deep-rooted caste-based prejudices. Some studies suggest that while urbanization may reduce overt caste discrimination, it does not necessarily lead to a complete dismantling of caste biases in intimate relationships. According to Goli et al. (2015), Caste-based biases remain ingrained in the cultural fabric, even in urban spaces, and inter-caste marriages continue to face social scrutiny despite the seeming modernity of cities. On the other hand, scholars argue that urban exposure and access to education provide a significant degree of social mobility, making it easier for individuals to form relationships that transcend traditional caste lines (2018). The variation in individual experiences may explain the contradiction between these views, as urban spaces themselves can still be deeply stratified along caste lines, with certain social groups having more access to power and resources than others. Ultimately, this suggests that while education and urbanization play a role in challenging caste norms, the complete eradication of caste-based discrimination requires broader social and structural reforms that go beyond individual experiences of mobility.

 

Conclusion

This study on Samaj and Inter-Caste Love Marriages Among Hindus in Southern Bangladesh highlights the complex interplay between caste-based social norms, individual choices, and the concept of Samaj in the context of inter-caste marriages. The research underscores that caste continues to hold significant influence, particularly in rural areas, where social pressures and community sanctions against inter-caste relationships remain strong. However, the findings also suggest that urban exposure, education, and financial independence play crucial roles in reducing the impact of these traditional caste-based barriers, offering individuals, especially women, more autonomy in their relationship choices. The gendered implications of caste-based Samaj are also evident, with women facing more severe repercussions in the form of social exclusion, violence, and familial rejection compared to men. While urbanization and education have proven to mitigate some of these challenges, the persistence of caste-based prejudices, even in urban areas, points to the need for further improvement. There is a need for comprehensive societal and structural changes to address caste discrimination fully.

Within the Shudra Samaj, marriage unites not just two individuals but also their families. (Goli et al., 2013). Inter-caste marriages, however, risk social isolation and family estrangement. Women, deemed central to caste purity, often face harsher sanctions than men. If a Sudra man marries “up” (to a higher caste), punishment is milder; “marrying down” provokes stricter reprimand. Nevertheless, modern education and economic factors are gradually influencing more flexible attitudes. The Samaj’s authority persists because it oversees life’s critical junctures—birth, marriage, and death—offering communal support and legitimacy. Although legal mechanisms allow for interfaith and inter-caste unions, most couples still weigh potential punishments, social stigma, and the risk of losing family ties. Consequently, inter-caste love marriages remain limited in number, but hints of greater openness suggest a gradual shift in future marriage practices.

 

 

 

References:

Basnet, C. (2015). Inter-Caste Relations and Intermarriage among Non-Dalit Hill Castes in Eastern Nepal. Contribution to Nepalese Studies, 42(1), 167–186.

BBS. (2023). Statistical yearbook Bangladesh 2022 = Bāṃlādeśa parisaṃkhyāna barshagrantha 2022 (42nd edition). Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Statistics & Informatics Division (SID), Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

Bhale, A. G. (2013). Perspective of Educated Youth on Inter-Caste Marriage. IJAAR, 1(1), 18–28.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Digital Map Download. (2025). Retrieved from https://oldweb.lged.gov.bd/ViewMap.aspx

Dhar, R. L. (2013). Intercaste Marriage: A Study from the Indian Context. Marriage & Family Review, 49(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2012.714720

Frejka, T., Jones, G. W., & Sardon, J. (2010). East Asian Childbearing Patterns and Policy Developments. Population and Development Review, 36(3), 579–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00347.x

Goli, S., Maurya, N. K., & Sharma, M. K. (2015). Continuing caste inequalities in rural Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(3/4), 252–272.

Goli, S., Singh, D., & Sekher, T. V. (2013). Exploring the Myth of Mixed Marriages in India: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 44(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.44.2.193

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.

Jaiswal, S. (1998). Caste: Origin, Function and Dimensions of Change. (No Title). https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282271665621248

 

Jha, M. K. (2018). BEYOND CONSUMPTION. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781003098416&type=googlepdf

Jones, G. W. (2017). Changing marriage patterns in Asia. In the Routledge Handbook of Asian Demography (pp. 351–369). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315148458-19/changing-marriage-patterns-asia-gavin-jones

Kalmijn, M. (1991). Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 786–800.

Kansakar, K., & Ghimire, S. (2008). Intricacies of inter-caste marriage between Dalits and non-Dalits in Nepal: Couples’ perspectives. Technical report. Social Inclusion Research Fund, Nepal.

King, N., Brooks, J., & Horrocks, C. (2018). Interviews in qualitative research. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5019272&publisher=FZ7200

Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. Int’l Lab. Rev., 133, 531.

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

Vaidyanathan, R. (2023a). Caste as social capital: The complex place of caste in Indian society. Penguin Random House India Private Limited. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6YDyEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA28&dq=Vaidyanathan+(2019)+caste,+hidu&ots=2yQoHIfTbB&sig=GhzsYTtw8YS3o7gzffJu5KyN7D8

Vaidyanathan, R. (2023b). Caste as social capital: The complex place of caste in Indian society. Penguin Random House India Private Limited. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6YDyEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA28&dq=Vaidyanathan,+A.+(2023).+Caste+and+social+mobility+in+South+Asia:+Historical+perspectives+and+contemporary+challenges.+&ots=2yQoHJbSft&sig=-Jvva7s78Co39EzBEpa1hO3qzuY